L no comment No problem
Odd choices here... not enough pictures and a pretty non descriptive description. Please update.
Description not descriptive
Sounds funny when you say it out loud :P
Dude...including Corsair press release pictures for the 250D isn't going to cut it. You gotta TRY at least...
Your part choices are really odd. Even for an AMD FM2+ mini-ITX build.
Nice to see that the only new part in your build is the mobo, but that mobo is really really cheap and I would not consider A75 for a 6600K. It also seems that you do not have the fans you have listed in your actual build.
Had I any other options while.in store I would've gladly accepted alternatives, I know the system is overpowered , doesnt hurt by any means, and the picture without the new fans is during the unboxing/build process not exactly final.
if you where to rely on the APU you should have bought 8gigs of 1866 ram, The psu is overkilled but it has no price so maybe it comes from your previous build. Another thing is that you should have gone with a FM2+ board which cost 100, this way you can still use the cpu that are coming on 2015 (better future proof)
I'd have gotten faster RAM for that APU. And more RAM.
And a way, way smaller PSU of higher quality.
And an aftermarket cooler was pointless.
And I'd never spend $100 on an MSI board; way too much for a company with poor QC.
Really an imbalanced and inefficient build.
Do u people even read the description he said this was from another build just moved everything into the smaller case with a smaller mobo
For 750$ you could've gotten an i5 and an R9 280... very odd parts choices here
i dont want to be cruel but did you even look at pc part picker before you built this pc , so very odd a ssd and then 1 stick ram (the speed is another issue ) why not a hdd then 2 sticks of ram .
i am not going to criticize the individual components as they are all wrong in one way or another and in my deference by submitting the build on here you are asking for comments , if you can send as much back as you can and start again ! research research research watching a simple video like from austin evans on youtube would have given you a shopping list for similar cost but way better balance
sorry but a big thumbs down for not doing any research
Its strange I have no issues with this config, its not optimal or totally balanced price wise, but performs over most expectations
idk why people are complaining about this build its a pretty solid apu my only problems would be that faster ram makes a world of difference with apu's (personal experience) and would have gone with an fm2+ board. +1
Thanks, I will probably bump up to 2133 8gb soon
The constructive criticism that I have to say is that 750w is overkill, even 400w would be plenty for this build. Secondly the money saved on the PSU you could've got faster speed RAM. Faster RAM really helps APU's. Also you overspent on the OS, for $90 on Amazon you could've bought Windows 7 - The same OS that you spend $180 for. Apart from that this build is clean and good, +1!
I'd like to clarify one thing: Windows 7 Home Premium ($90) is not the same thing as Windows 7 Ultimate ($180)
Yes but there is not a big difference to justify the cost difference.
The difference is there though. Your original comment implied that the $180 Ultimate edition was the same as the Home Premium. Also, while I too couldn't have justified spending $180 on an OS, OP may have needed the features included in the Ultimate edition.
All parts and software previously purchased, aside from the motherboard
this build doesnt make much sense. Overkill powersupply, 2 TB hard drive, and an SSD with windows ULTIMATE, but didnt have the money for a graphics card